Categories
Master´s Thesis 2020 Material Turn

Hybrid Territories: Towards a New Sublime and the Cybernetic Meadow

Design / Part I – Relationship to the Landscape

Location, Precondition & Scale Factor

The narrative takes places in the state of Nevada. Craved by tech companies for its massive tax breaks, in the last twenty-five years has seen a radical act of urbanization shaped by warehouses, but most importantly data centres, which increased not just in number but scale as well in order to be able to accommodate and store the ever-growing digital content we produce.

Scale comparison: Diagram scale comparison between automated infrastructures (left) and form of land-art artworks (right).

The only way to look at this phenomenon in the countryside is to look at the history of Land art as both contain similarities in the evolution of scale but also the context of intervention. This study has not been informative just in terms of scale reference but also provides an interesting question for the design proposal. Given this similarity, can an alternative form of data centre intervene in the landscape as a feature in the landscape as a land-art does?

Concept

The existing depression in the ground suggests a building which presence in the landscape does not impose itself but rather becomes a feature in it by acting as an artificial wall at the extreme edges of the existing dip. With these concept baselines, the design process progressed through a series of massing proposals which landed on the final design operation of manipulating the roof to create a formal counterpart to the landscape and provide a seamless transition from the landside to the roof of the prototype…

…This operation advance by contouring the initial iteration in order to create singular profiles which have been turned into slabs in order to acquire major control over the manipulation of the roof which ultimately results in blending each roof’s closest edge to the landside in direction of the landscape, establishing consequently a new relationship with it.

Sequence concept development / from left to right: (Step 1)To accommodate a prototype of that scale (1.8 km long / 210 m wide) the context of the countryside was the most appropriate one and the choice landed in a desert area in the northern side of TRIC district. (Step 2) The existing depression in the ground suggests a building which presence in the landscape does not impose itself but rather becomes a feature in it by acting as an artificial wall at the extreme edges of the dip. (Step 3) With these concept baselines, the design process progressed through a series of massing proposals which landed on the final design operation of manipulating the roof to create a formal counterpart to the landscape and seamless transition from the land side to the roof of the prototype.
Sequence concept development / from left to right: (Step 4) The previous operation advanced by contouring the initial iteration in order to create singular profiles. (Step 5) These, have been turned into slabs in order to acquire major control over the manipulation over the roof. (Step 6) Ultimately results in blending each roof’s closest edge to the land-side in direction to the landscape establishing consequently a new relationship with it.